HackerFriction Feedback

Products · Product

Clojure

Raised as a usability problem by 175 people on Hacker News over 18 years (2009–2026), in 150 threads.

Ranked by people · period

No issue was raised by at least 3 people in 3 threads this year.

  1. 1
    Stack traces are verbose, errors buried in Java code and hard to mapUnreviewed

    5 people in the last 5 years · 4 threads

  1. 1
    Stack traces are verbose, errors buried in Java code and hard to mapUnreviewed

    28 people since the beginning · 25 threads

  2. 2
    Build tool options confuse beginners, with customisation overwhelmingUnreviewed

    7 people since the beginning · 6 threads

  3. 3
    Leiningen builds are slow and reloading files into REPL is unclearUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  4. 4
    Beginners find parentheses syntax annoying at firstUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  5. 5
    Spending far too much time getting tooling set upUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  6. 6
    REPL lacks line editing and up-arrow historyUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  7. 7
    Too many library choices slow beginners' ramp-upUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  8. 8
    Docs lack examples and tutorials, making the language hard to learnUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

Every issue, all time, most people first

  1. Stack traces are verbose, errors buried in Java code and hard to mapUnreviewed

    28 people since 2010, in 13 different years · none this year

    2009: 0 people2010: 3 people2011: 1 person2012: 1 person2013: 2 people2014: 1 person2015: 4 people2016: 2 people2017: 4 people2018: 3 people2019: 0 people2020: 2 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 2 people2024: 2 people2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20092026
    Something wrong here?
  2. Build tool options confuse beginners, with customisation overwhelmingUnreviewed

    7 people since 2010, in 5 different years · none this year

    2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 2 people2021: 2 people2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20092026
    Something wrong here?
  3. Leiningen builds are slow and reloading files into REPL is unclearUnreviewed

    4 people since 2014, in 4 different years · none this year

    2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 1 person2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20092026
    Something wrong here?
  4. Beginners find parentheses syntax annoying at firstUnreviewed

    4 people since 2019, in 4 different years · none this year

    2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 1 person2024: 0 people2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20092026
    Something wrong here?
  5. Spending far too much time getting tooling set upUnreviewed

    4 people since 2019, in 3 different years · none this year

    2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 2 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 1 person2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20092026
    Something wrong here?
  6. REPL lacks line editing and up-arrow historyUnreviewed

    3 people since 2011, in 2 different years · none this year

    2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 1 person2012: 2 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20092026
    Something wrong here?
  7. Too many library choices slow beginners' ramp-upUnreviewed

    3 people since 2020, in 2 different years · none this year

    2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 1 person2021: 0 people2022: 2 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20092026
    Something wrong here?
  8. Docs lack examples and tutorials, making the language hard to learnUnreviewed

    3 people since 2011, in 2 different years · none this year

    2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 1 person2012: 0 people2013: 2 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20092026
    Something wrong here?

This list counts all time; the period switch above only changes the ranking. Each issue is a group of similar complaints raised by at least 3 people in 3 different months and threads. Each line under an issue is Claude Haiku's summary of one of its latest comments, not a quote; follow it to read the comment on Hacker News.

Unreviewed issues were grouped by machine: Claude Haiku labelled each comment as a usability complaint, named what it's about and summed up the problem in a line, and a small model grouped similar problems. Nobody has checked them by hand. Expect mistakes.

The newest 50 complaints