HackerFriction Feedback

Products · Product

Confluence

Raised as a usability problem by 217 people on Hacker News over 19 years (2008–2026), in 136 threads.

Ranked by people · period

  1. 1
    Slow enough to become unusableUnreviewed

    3 people this year · 3 threads

  1. 1
    Slow enough to become unusableUnreviewed

    13 people in the last 5 years · 12 threads

  2. 2
    Search results are poor and hard to rely onUnreviewed

    11 people in the last 5 years · 10 threads

  3. 3
    Search misses pages even when the exact title is typedUnreviewed

    7 people in the last 5 years · 6 threads

  1. 1
    Slow enough to become unusableUnreviewed

    34 people since the beginning · 29 threads

  2. 2
    Search results are poor and hard to rely onUnreviewed

    24 people since the beginning · 19 threads

  3. 3
    Search misses pages even when the exact title is typedUnreviewed

    15 people since the beginning · 14 threads

  4. 4
    Wiki markup syntax removed, making formatting harderUnreviewed

    5 people since the beginning · 5 threads

  5. 5
    Outdated company documentation hides accurate informationUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  6. 6
    Pasted markdown is wrapped in code tags, not formattedUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  7. 7
    Pasted tables get garbled, keystrokes jump, and undo is unpredictableUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  8. 8
    Moving pages is hard, so content gets disorganisedUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  9. 9
    Complex organisation makes finding anything hardUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

Every issue, all time, most people first

  1. Slow enough to become unusableUnreviewed

    34 people since 2010, in 10 different years · 3 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 3 people2019: 0 people2020: 6 people2021: 10 people2022: 5 people2023: 2 people2024: 2 people2025: 1 person2026: 3 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  2. Search results are poor and hard to rely onUnreviewed

    24 people since 2010, in 10 different years · 1 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 1 person2017: 0 people2018: 1 person2019: 1 person2020: 5 people2021: 6 people2022: 6 people2023: 2 people2024: 2 people2025: 0 people2026: 1 person
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  3. Search misses pages even when the exact title is typedUnreviewed

    15 people since 2015, in 8 different years · 1 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 1 person2021: 4 people2022: 4 people2023: 3 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 1 person
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  4. Wiki markup syntax removed, making formatting harderUnreviewed

    5 people since 2012, in 5 different years · 1 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 1 person2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 1 person
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  5. Outdated company documentation hides accurate informationUnreviewed

    4 people since 2018, in 4 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 1 person2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 1 person2023: 1 person2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  6. Pasted markdown is wrapped in code tags, not formattedUnreviewed

    4 people since 2019, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 2 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  7. Pasted tables get garbled, keystrokes jump, and undo is unpredictableUnreviewed

    3 people since 2012, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 1 person2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  8. Moving pages is hard, so content gets disorganisedUnreviewed

    3 people since 2019, in 2 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 2 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  9. Complex organisation makes finding anything hardUnreviewed

    3 people since 2017, in 2 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 2 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?

This list counts all time; the period switch above only changes the ranking. Each issue is a group of similar complaints raised by at least 3 people in 3 different months and threads. Each line under an issue is Claude Haiku's summary of one of its latest comments, not a quote; follow it to read the comment on Hacker News.

Unreviewed issues were grouped by machine: Claude Haiku labelled each comment as a usability complaint, named what it's about and summed up the problem in a line, and a small model grouped similar problems. Nobody has checked them by hand. Expect mistakes.

The newest 50 complaints