HackerFriction Feedback

Products · Product

DuckDuckGo

Raised as a usability problem by 446 people on Hacker News over 19 years (2008–2026), in 257 threads.

Ranked by people · period

  1. 1
    Ignores quoted or specified terms, showing unrelated resultsUnreviewed

    5 people this year · 5 threads

  1. 1
    Ignores quoted or specified terms, showing unrelated resultsUnreviewed

    17 people in the last 5 years · 16 threads

  2. 2
    Results loosely match what the user wants, worsening over timeUnreviewed

    7 people in the last 5 years · 7 threads

  3. 3
    Local-language searches return results not specific to the countryUnreviewed

    4 people in the last 5 years · 4 threads

  4. 4
    Very specific searches fail, forcing retyping with !gUnreviewed

    3 people in the last 5 years · 3 threads

  5. 5
    Site-restricted searches return worse resultsUnreviewed

    3 people in the last 5 years · 3 threads

  6. 6
    Results flooded with AI-generated junk sitesUnreviewed

    3 people in the last 5 years · 3 threads

  1. 1
    Results loosely match what the user wants, worsening over timeUnreviewed

    50 people since the beginning · 47 threads

  2. 2
    Ignores quoted or specified terms, showing unrelated resultsUnreviewed

    35 people since the beginning · 32 threads

  3. 3
    Search results are slow to load compared with GoogleUnreviewed

    26 people since the beginning · 21 threads

  4. 4
    Local-language searches return results not specific to the countryUnreviewed

    15 people since the beginning · 14 threads

  5. 5
    Very specific searches fail, forcing retyping with !gUnreviewed

    13 people since the beginning · 13 threads

  6. 6
    Infinite scrolling on results page is hard to useUnreviewed

    10 people since the beginning · 9 threads

  7. 7
    Low contrast makes results hard to readUnreviewed

    9 people since the beginning · 5 threads

  8. 8
    Bang shortcuts are cumbersome and should be clickableUnreviewed

    8 people since the beginning · 8 threads

  9. 9
    Top of results shows an ad and one Wikipedia hitUnreviewed

    6 people since the beginning · 6 threads

  10. 10
    Results are harder to scan due to font and spacingUnreviewed

    6 people since the beginning · 5 threads

  11. 11
    Clicking results goes through a slow interstitial pageUnreviewed

    5 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  12. 12
    Arrow keys highlight results instead of scrolling the pageUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  13. 13
    Official Python docs rank too low, below sites like w3schoolsUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  14. 14
    Interface is cluttered with too many options and buttonsUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  15. 15
    URL doesn't reflect current search, breaking copy-pasteUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  16. 16
    Site-restricted searches return worse resultsUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  17. 17
    Scrolling sometimes feels slow in the appUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  18. 18
    Image search for ordinary terms returns pornUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  19. 19
    Can't filter all results by date rangeUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  20. 20
    Searches for obscure error messages rarely find useful resultsUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  21. 21
    Takes seconds to spot the Official Site linkUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  22. 22
    Can't set HTML version as Firefox Mobile search engine due to POSTUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  23. 23
    Results flooded with AI-generated junk sitesUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  24. 24
    Silently rewrites queries, hiding what was searchedUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  25. 25
    Minutes of filtering needed to find usable resultsUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

Every issue, all time, most people first

  1. Results loosely match what the user wants, worsening over timeUnreviewed

    50 people since 2010, in 16 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 1 person2012: 2 people2013: 4 people2014: 3 people2015: 4 people2016: 2 people2017: 2 people2018: 6 people2019: 7 people2020: 7 people2021: 5 people2022: 4 people2023: 1 person2024: 1 person2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  2. Ignores quoted or specified terms, showing unrelated resultsUnreviewed

    35 people since 2010, in 12 different years · 5 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 1 person2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 3 people2019: 8 people2020: 5 people2021: 2 people2022: 5 people2023: 6 people2024: 2 people2025: 1 person2026: 4 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  3. Search results are slow to load compared with GoogleUnreviewed

    26 people since 2010, in 10 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 2 people2011: 1 person2012: 8 people2013: 3 people2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 5 people2020: 1 person2021: 2 people2022: 0 people2023: 2 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  4. Local-language searches return results not specific to the countryUnreviewed

    15 people since 2014, in 8 different years · 2 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 2 people2015: 0 people2016: 1 person2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 6 people2021: 1 person2022: 1 person2023: 1 person2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 2 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  5. Very specific searches fail, forcing retyping with !gUnreviewed

    13 people since 2012, in 11 different years · 1 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 1 person2013: 1 person2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 1 person2019: 1 person2020: 3 people2021: 1 person2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 1 person
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  6. Infinite scrolling on results page is hard to useUnreviewed

    10 people since 2009, in 8 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 1 person2010: 1 person2011: 1 person2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 3 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 1 person2019: 1 person2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  7. Low contrast makes results hard to readUnreviewed

    9 people since 2010, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 0 people2012: 1 person2013: 0 people2014: 7 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  8. Bang shortcuts are cumbersome and should be clickableUnreviewed

    8 people since 2015, in 6 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 2 people2019: 4 people2020: 2 people2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  9. Top of results shows an ad and one Wikipedia hitUnreviewed

    6 people since 2012, in 5 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 2 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 1 person2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  10. Results are harder to scan due to font and spacingUnreviewed

    6 people since 2008, in 5 different years · none this year

    2008: 1 person2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 2 people2015: 1 person2016: 1 person2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  11. Clicking results goes through a slow interstitial pageUnreviewed

    5 people since 2013, in 4 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 1 person2014: 2 people2015: 0 people2016: 1 person2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 1 person2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  12. Arrow keys highlight results instead of scrolling the pageUnreviewed

    4 people since 2015, in 4 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  13. Official Python docs rank too low, below sites like w3schoolsUnreviewed

    3 people since 2019, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 1 person2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  14. Interface is cluttered with too many options and buttonsUnreviewed

    3 people since 2012, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 1 person2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 1 person2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  15. URL doesn't reflect current search, breaking copy-pasteUnreviewed

    3 people since 2014, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  16. Site-restricted searches return worse resultsUnreviewed

    3 people since 2021, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  17. Scrolling sometimes feels slow in the appUnreviewed

    3 people since 2012, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 1 person2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 1 person2019: 1 person2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  18. Image search for ordinary terms returns pornUnreviewed

    3 people since 2020, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 1 person2021: 1 person2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  19. Can't filter all results by date rangeUnreviewed

    3 people since 2011, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 1 person2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 1 person2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  20. Searches for obscure error messages rarely find useful resultsUnreviewed

    3 people since 2013, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 1 person2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 1 person2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  21. Can't set HTML version as Firefox Mobile search engine due to POSTUnreviewed

    3 people since 2015, in 2 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 2 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  22. Results flooded with AI-generated junk sitesUnreviewed

    3 people since 2025, in 2 different years · 2 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 1 person2026: 2 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  23. Silently rewrites queries, hiding what was searchedUnreviewed

    3 people since 2019, in 2 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 2 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  24. Minutes of filtering needed to find usable resultsUnreviewed

    3 people since 2014, in 2 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 2 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?

This list counts all time; the period switch above only changes the ranking. Each issue is a group of similar complaints raised by at least 3 people in 3 different months and threads. Each line under an issue is Claude Haiku's summary of one of its latest comments, not a quote; follow it to read the comment on Hacker News.

Unreviewed issues were grouped by machine: Claude Haiku labelled each comment as a usability complaint, named what it's about and summed up the problem in a line, and a small model grouped similar problems. Nobody has checked them by hand. Expect mistakes.

The newest 50 complaints