HackerFriction Feedback

Products · Product

Haskell

Raised as a usability problem by 271 people on Hacker News over 19 years (2008–2026), in 241 threads.

Ranked by people · period

  1. 1
    Syntax is weird and hard for beginners to learnUnreviewed

    3 people this year · 3 threads

  1. 1
    Syntax is weird and hard for beginners to learnUnreviewed

    13 people in the last 5 years · 10 threads

  2. 2
    Type mismatch error messages are hard to understand for beginnersUnreviewed

    6 people in the last 5 years · 6 threads

  3. 3
    Reasoning about performance is hard because of lazy evaluationUnreviewed

    4 people in the last 5 years · 4 threads

  4. 4
    Can't understand monads despite multiple explanationsUnreviewed

    3 people in the last 5 years · 3 threads

  5. 5
    Libraries need many confusing language extensions to get workingUnreviewed

    3 people in the last 5 years · 3 threads

  1. 1
    Syntax is weird and hard for beginners to learnUnreviewed

    48 people since the beginning · 43 threads

  2. 2
    Type mismatch error messages are hard to understand for beginnersUnreviewed

    17 people since the beginning · 17 threads

  3. 3
    Too many operators to remember and search forUnreviewed

    15 people since the beginning · 14 threads

  4. 4
    Can't understand monads despite multiple explanationsUnreviewed

    14 people since the beginning · 14 threads

  5. 5
    Reasoning about performance is hard because of lazy evaluationUnreviewed

    12 people since the beginning · 12 threads

  6. 6
    Tool setup is hard, with install commands cited as the exampleUnreviewed

    12 people since the beginning · 12 threads

  7. 7
  8. 8
    Indentation rules are hard to learn and hard to search forUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  9. 9
    do-notation is hard to read, requiring mental desugaringUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  10. 10
    Documentation uses type theory terms that are hard to followUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  11. 11
    Error messages point to the wrong place, hard to act onUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  12. 12
    Most libraries are hard to use and don't compose wellUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  13. 13
    Point-free style and overloaded operators make code unreadableUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  14. 14
    Libraries need many confusing language extensions to get workingUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  15. 15
    Code lacks visual structure cues, so it is hard to readUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

Every issue, all time, most people first

  1. Syntax is weird and hard for beginners to learnUnreviewed

    48 people since 2009, in 15 different years · 3 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 1 person2010: 1 person2011: 3 people2012: 4 people2013: 5 people2014: 8 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 4 people2019: 6 people2020: 2 people2021: 1 person2022: 3 people2023: 4 people2024: 2 people2025: 0 people2026: 3 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  2. Type mismatch error messages are hard to understand for beginnersUnreviewed

    17 people since 2010, in 10 different years · 1 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 2 people2016: 2 people2017: 0 people2018: 2 people2019: 0 people2020: 1 person2021: 2 people2022: 3 people2023: 0 people2024: 2 people2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  3. Too many operators to remember and search forUnreviewed

    15 people since 2010, in 9 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 2 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 2 people2015: 0 people2016: 2 people2017: 0 people2018: 1 person2019: 1 person2020: 4 people2021: 0 people2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  4. Can't understand monads despite multiple explanationsUnreviewed

    14 people since 2012, in 11 different years · 1 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 2 people2013: 1 person2014: 2 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 2 people2019: 1 person2020: 2 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 2 people2024: 2 people2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  5. Reasoning about performance is hard because of lazy evaluationUnreviewed

    12 people since 2011, in 9 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 1 person2012: 1 person2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 1 person2017: 1 person2018: 1 person2019: 2 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 3 people2023: 0 people2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  6. Tool setup is hard, with install commands cited as the exampleUnreviewed

    12 people since 2010, in 9 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 1 person2014: 2 people2015: 1 person2016: 2 people2017: 0 people2018: 1 person2019: 2 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 1 person2023: 1 person2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  7. Operator precedence is hard to map, forcing trial-and-error with dollar signsUnreviewed

    7 people since 2012, in 6 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 1 person2013: 1 person2014: 2 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 1 person2019: 1 person2020: 1 person2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  8. Indentation rules are hard to learn and hard to search forUnreviewed

    4 people since 2008, in 4 different years · none this year

    2008: 1 person2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 1 person2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  9. do-notation is hard to read, requiring mental desugaringUnreviewed

    4 people since 2013, in 4 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 1 person2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  10. Documentation uses type theory terms that are hard to followUnreviewed

    3 people since 2012, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 1 person2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  11. Error messages point to the wrong place, hard to act onUnreviewed

    3 people since 2016, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 1 person2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 1 person2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  12. Most libraries are hard to use and don't compose wellUnreviewed

    3 people since 2016, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 1 person2017: 0 people2018: 1 person2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  13. Point-free style and overloaded operators make code unreadableUnreviewed

    3 people since 2011, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 1 person2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 1 person2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  14. Libraries need many confusing language extensions to get workingUnreviewed

    3 people since 2022, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 1 person2023: 1 person2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  15. Code lacks visual structure cues, so it is hard to readUnreviewed

    3 people since 2011, in 3 different years · 1 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 1 person2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 1 person2026: 1 person
    20082026
    Something wrong here?

This list counts all time; the period switch above only changes the ranking. Each issue is a group of similar complaints raised by at least 3 people in 3 different months and threads. Each line under an issue is Claude Haiku's summary of one of its latest comments, not a quote; follow it to read the comment on Hacker News.

Unreviewed issues were grouped by machine: Claude Haiku labelled each comment as a usability complaint, named what it's about and summed up the problem in a line, and a small model grouped similar problems. Nobody has checked them by hand. Expect mistakes.

The newest 50 complaints