HackerFriction Feedback

Products · Product

Lisp

Raised as a usability problem by 97 people on Hacker News over 20 years (2007–2026), in 93 threads.

Ranked by people · period

  1. 1
    Nested parentheses make Lisp code hard to read and editUnreviewed

    5 people this year · 4 threads

  1. 1
    Nested parentheses make Lisp code hard to read and editUnreviewed

    11 people in the last 5 years · 10 threads

  1. 1
    Nested parentheses make Lisp code hard to read and editUnreviewed

    24 people since the beginning · 23 threads

  2. 2
    Macro-heavy code hides what actually happens from readersUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  3. 3
    Newcomers struggle to work out which Lisp download to getUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  4. 4
    Getting Lisp running requires learning Emacs or the JVM firstUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

Every issue, all time, most people first

  1. Nested parentheses make Lisp code hard to read and editUnreviewed

    24 people since 2009, in 15 different years · 5 this year

    2007: 0 people2008: 0 people2009: 1 person2010: 1 person2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 2 people2014: 0 people2015: 2 people2016: 1 person2017: 1 person2018: 2 people2019: 2 people2020: 1 person2021: 1 person2022: 1 person2023: 2 people2024: 2 people2025: 1 person2026: 5 people
    20072026
    Something wrong here?
  2. Macro-heavy code hides what actually happens from readersUnreviewed

    4 people since 2019, in 3 different years · none this year

    2007: 0 people2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 0 people2021: 2 people2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20072026
    Something wrong here?
  3. Newcomers struggle to work out which Lisp download to getUnreviewed

    3 people since 2008, in 3 different years · none this year

    2007: 0 people2008: 1 person2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20072026
    Something wrong here?
  4. Getting Lisp running requires learning Emacs or the JVM firstUnreviewed

    3 people since 2009, in 3 different years · none this year

    2007: 0 people2008: 0 people2009: 1 person2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 1 person2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20072026
    Something wrong here?

This list counts all time; the period switch above only changes the ranking. Each issue is a group of similar complaints raised by at least 3 people in 3 different months and threads. Each line under an issue is Claude Haiku's summary of one of its latest comments, not a quote; follow it to read the comment on Hacker News.

Unreviewed issues were grouped by machine: Claude Haiku labelled each comment as a usability complaint, named what it's about and summed up the problem in a line, and a small model grouped similar problems. Nobody has checked them by hand. Expect mistakes.

The newest 50 complaints