HackerFriction Feedback

Products · Product

Scala

Raised as a usability problem by 119 people on Hacker News over 19 years (2008–2026), in 116 threads.

Ranked by people · period

No issue was raised by at least 3 people in 3 threads this year.

  1. 1
    IDE tooling is slow, making it cumbersome to useUnreviewed

    3 people in the last 5 years · 3 threads

  1. 1
    IDE tooling is slow, making it cumbersome to useUnreviewed

    15 people since the beginning · 15 threads

  2. 2
    Implicits so convoluted IDEs cannot work out what happensUnreviewed

    9 people since the beginning · 9 threads

  3. 3
    Every compile takes 5-10 seconds, breaking flowUnreviewed

    9 people since the beginning · 9 threads

  4. 4
    Many ways to do things and confusing syntax sugarUnreviewed

    8 people since the beginning · 8 threads

  5. 5
    Compiler error messages are poor, hard to diagnose problemsUnreviewed

    8 people since the beginning · 7 threads

  6. 6
    Docs hard to navigate; basic structures need careful readingUnreviewed

    6 people since the beginning · 6 threads

  7. 7
    Type inference fails on trivial code, forcing annotationsUnreviewed

    4 people since the beginning · 4 threads

  8. 8
    Stack traces hard to read when runtime crashes happenUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  9. 9
    Type system requires awkward contortions to express intentUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

  10. 10
    Too many little methods with subtle differences to rememberUnreviewed

    3 people since the beginning · 3 threads

Every issue, all time, most people first

  1. IDE tooling is slow, making it cumbersome to useUnreviewed

    15 people since 2010, in 11 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 1 person2011: 2 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 3 people2017: 2 people2018: 1 person2019: 0 people2020: 1 person2021: 2 people2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 2 people2025: 1 person2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  2. Implicits so convoluted IDEs cannot work out what happensUnreviewed

    9 people since 2011, in 8 different years · 1 this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 1 person2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 2 people2019: 1 person2020: 1 person2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 1 person2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 1 person
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  3. Every compile takes 5-10 seconds, breaking flowUnreviewed

    9 people since 2011, in 6 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 3 people2012: 0 people2013: 1 person2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 1 person2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 2 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  4. Many ways to do things and confusing syntax sugarUnreviewed

    8 people since 2011, in 7 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 2 people2012: 0 people2013: 1 person2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 1 person2019: 1 person2020: 1 person2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  5. Compiler error messages are poor, hard to diagnose problemsUnreviewed

    8 people since 2008, in 6 different years · none this year

    2008: 1 person2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 1 person2016: 2 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 2 people2022: 1 person2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  6. Docs hard to navigate; basic structures need careful readingUnreviewed

    6 people since 2011, in 6 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 1 person2012: 0 people2013: 1 person2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 1 person2017: 1 person2018: 1 person2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  7. Type inference fails on trivial code, forcing annotationsUnreviewed

    4 people since 2013, in 4 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 1 person2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 1 person2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  8. Stack traces hard to read when runtime crashes happenUnreviewed

    3 people since 2013, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 1 person2014: 0 people2015: 0 people2016: 1 person2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 0 people2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  9. Type system requires awkward contortions to express intentUnreviewed

    3 people since 2014, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 1 person2015: 0 people2016: 0 people2017: 0 people2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 1 person2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?
  10. Too many little methods with subtle differences to rememberUnreviewed

    3 people since 2015, in 3 different years · none this year

    2008: 0 people2009: 0 people2010: 0 people2011: 0 people2012: 0 people2013: 0 people2014: 0 people2015: 1 person2016: 0 people2017: 1 person2018: 0 people2019: 0 people2020: 0 people2021: 0 people2022: 0 people2023: 0 people2024: 1 person2025: 0 people2026: 0 people
    20082026
    Something wrong here?

This list counts all time; the period switch above only changes the ranking. Each issue is a group of similar complaints raised by at least 3 people in 3 different months and threads. Each line under an issue is Claude Haiku's summary of one of its latest comments, not a quote; follow it to read the comment on Hacker News.

Unreviewed issues were grouped by machine: Claude Haiku labelled each comment as a usability complaint, named what it's about and summed up the problem in a line, and a small model grouped similar problems. Nobody has checked them by hand. Expect mistakes.

The newest 50 complaints