Products · Product
TeXmacs
Raised as a usability problem by 14 people on Hacker News over 10 years (2016–2025), in 9 threads.
People raised many different problems with TeXmacs, but no single problem has yet been raised by 3 people in 3 different months and threads.
Unreviewed issues were grouped by machine: Claude Haiku labelled each comment as a usability complaint, named what it's about and summed up the problem in a line, and a small model grouped similar problems. Nobody has checked them by hand. Expect mistakes.
The newest 15 complaints
- Symbols and diacritics appear as bespoke ASCII codes when the file is opened as text2025-09-27
- UI is hard to navigate and feels clunky to use2025-03-28
- Tables need manual column resizing and output is lower quality than LaTeX2022-07-23
- Hard to figure out how to use macros and customize layout2022-04-06
- Error messages are unintuitive, so users can't tell what went wrong when compilation fails2020-11-05
- Defining a macro needs a separate mouse hunt-and-click to insert each argument2020-05-06
- Mailing list archive search only covers one month, and multi-month search is non-obvious2020-04-19
- Early interface was clumsy, unresponsive, and many things were unintuitive2020-04-16
- Interface is unintuitive and takes time to get used to2020-04-16
- Keyboard latency makes typing too slow for fast touch typists2019-07-02
- Clicking a lower video changes a video far up the page, so nothing seems to happen2019-06-30
- Feels clumsy for users forcing a previous ASCII/LaTeX workflow onto it2019-06-29
- Editor feels slow and clunky to use compared to writing LaTeX directly2019-06-29
- Finding commands in toolbars and menus is obtuse; shortcuts are hard to discover2016-02-15
- Emacs-style keybindings and buffer layout are very confusing to users unfamiliar with them2016-02-15